Assumptions: 400K home price, nominal 20% down, 30 year fixed
Scenario 1:
Down: 40%
Interest Rate: 5.25%
Loan Amount: 240K
Scenario 2:
Down 20%
Interest Rate: 5.25%
Loan Amount: 320K
Prepayment in the first five years: 80K
Under this scenario, I want to understand which one would be financially better - we can assume that closing costs are the same for both. The way I look at it, scenario 1 reducing the loan principal upfront but the loan is assessed for 30 years while scenario 2 has higher starting principal but with prepayment, the effective loan period is reduced from 30 to lets say 20 years. Running the numbers, I get a lower total cost of interest on scenario 2 than scenario 1.
Is this reasoning correct? Any thoughts/opinions are highly appreciated.
by Bubbley17
from ,
. Aug 4th 2009
Debra Clark (Debra Clark)
This obviously also depends on how long you intend to stay at the house. If you are looking to stay in the house more than 5 years, I would certainly take loan#2 since u have the same interest rate but u have put less money down and not tied up your cash in down payment
Ask our community a question.